GED Essay Example: Standardized Testing

GED essay on standardized testing appears frequently as a topic on high school equivalency and college readiness exams, addressing debates over its fairness, accuracy, and impact on students and schools. These essays often ask you to evaluate the role of standardized assessments in measuring learning outcomes, shaping curriculum, or influencing educational policy. You’ll be expected to analyze arguments from multiple sources, weigh evidence, and present a clear position on how standardized testing affects the education system.

Read the prompt and task instruction below. Your task is to write a well-organized extended response of at least 300 words in 45 minutes, as shown in the Model Response that follows.

GED Essay Samples by Topics

GED Writing Resources

Edit Template

Task Instruction

Analyze the arguments presented in the two speeches. In your response, develop an argument in which you explain how one position is better supported than the other. Incorporate relevant and specific evidence from both sources to support your argument. Remember, the better-argued position is not necessarily the position with which you agree. This task should take approximately 45 minutes to complete.

Passage A

How Standardized Testing Ensures Fairness and Quality

By Dr. Jennifer Stevens, Education Research Analyst

Standardized testing serves as a crucial tool for ensuring educational quality and equity across American schools. Without consistent measurement standards, there would be no reliable way to compare student achievement between different schools, districts, or states. These assessments provide objective data that helps identify achievement gaps between different demographic groups, allowing educators and policymakers to target resources where they are needed most.

Research conducted by the Educational Testing Service demonstrates that standardized tests are strong predictors of college readiness and future academic success. Students who perform well on these assessments are significantly more likely to succeed in higher education and professional careers. This predictive power makes standardized testing an invaluable tool for college admissions officers and employers who need reliable measures of academic capability.

Furthermore, standardized testing creates accountability for schools and teachers. When test scores are publicly reported, schools face pressure to improve instruction and ensure all students receive quality education. This transparency has led to significant improvements in educational outcomes, particularly for historically underserved populations. Districts with consistently low scores are required to implement reform measures, receive additional support, or face intervention from state education departments.

Standardized tests also provide valuable diagnostic information that helps teachers identify specific areas where students struggle. The detailed score reports break down performance by subject area and skill level, allowing educators to tailor instruction to meet individual student needs. This data-driven approach to education ensures that teaching is focused and effective rather than based on guesswork or intuition.

Critics often argue that standardized testing creates stress for students, but this overlooks the reality that assessment is a natural part of learning. Students regularly face evaluations in the form of quizzes, exams, and projects throughout their academic careers. Standardized tests simply extend this process to ensure consistent benchmarks across all schools.

Ultimately, standardized testing provides essential accountability, equity, and diagnostic information that improves educational outcomes for all students. While the testing process may be challenging, the benefits of consistent measurement and data-driven instruction far outweigh any temporary stress students may experience. These assessments remain our best tool for ensuring that every student receives a quality education regardless of their school or background.

Passage B

The Problems with Standardized Testing

By Sarah Johnson, Educational Policy Researcher

Standardized testing has fundamentally distorted American education, transforming vibrant learning environments into test-preparation factories. The intense focus on test scores has forced teachers to narrow their curriculum, spending countless hours drilling students on test-taking strategies rather than fostering critical thinking, creativity, and genuine understanding. Subjects like art, music, social studies, and science receive minimal attention because they are not heavily tested, creating an impoverished educational experience.

Multiple research studies, including comprehensive analyses by the National Academy of Education, reveal that standardized test scores correlate more strongly with family income and socioeconomic status than with teaching quality or school effectiveness. Wealthy students consistently outperform their low-income peers, not because they attend better schools, but because they have access to test preparation resources, tutoring, and stable home environments that support academic achievement. Using these biased measures to evaluate schools unfairly penalizes institutions serving disadvantaged communities.

The psychological impact of high-stakes testing on students cannot be ignored. Elementary and middle school students report anxiety, sleep problems, and physical symptoms related to test stress. Many capable students perform poorly under pressure, leading to inaccurate assessments of their abilities and potential. Teachers describe classrooms filled with stressed, unmotivated students who view learning as a series of hurdles to clear rather than exciting opportunities for growth and discovery.

Standardized testing also undermines teacher professionalism by reducing educators to test score producers. Experienced teachers report feeling demoralized when their evaluation depends heavily on factors beyond their control, such as student poverty levels, language barriers, and family instability. This system drives quality educators away from high-need schools and discourages talented individuals from entering the teaching profession altogether.

The enormous financial costs of standardized testing drain resources from actual instruction. School districts spend billions of dollars annually on test development, administration, and scoring that could otherwise fund smaller class sizes, updated textbooks, technology, and enrichment programs. States pay testing companies massive contracts while simultaneously cutting funding for libraries, counselors, and arts programs.

Furthermore, international comparisons show that countries with the highest educational achievement, such as Finland and Singapore, use standardized testing sparingly and focus instead on developing teachers, supporting students holistically, and creating engaging curricula. These nations prove that educational excellence is possible without the heavy emphasis on standardized assessment that characterizes American schools.

In conclusion, standardized testing has created more problems than it has solved in American education. Rather than improving instruction, these assessments have narrowed learning, increased inequality, and damaged student motivation. True educational reform requires moving beyond simplistic test scores toward comprehensive evaluation methods that honor the complexity of teaching and learning.

Model Response on GED Essay Standardized Testing Topic

The debate over standardized testing in American education presents compelling arguments on both sides. However, Sarah Johnson presents the stronger and more persuasive argument. Her comprehensive analysis covers educational, social, and economic factors effectively.

While Dr. Jennifer Stevens raises valid points about accountability and the diagnostic value of standardized testing, her argument depends largely on theoretical benefits. She does not fully address the significant problems testing creates in schools, including increased stress for students and a narrowed curriculum. Her claim that standardized tests predict college success overlooks the fact that scores often reflect socioeconomic advantages, such as access to tutoring and resources, rather than true academic ability. In addition, her view that test-related stress is only “temporary” minimizes the real anxiety and pressure many students experience.

On the other hand, Johnson provides a more well-rounded analysis of standardized testing’s impact. She examines how testing actually affects all groups involved in the education system, including students, teachers, and schools. By considering their experiences together, Johnson presents a more complete picture rather than Dr. Stevens’s sole focus on administrative convenience.

Johnson also highlights the financial impact of testing that Dr. Stevens seems to ignore. Schools and states spend billions on test development, scoring, and contracts with testing companies. This money could instead support programs proven to help students, like smaller class sizes and enrichment opportunities. By addressing the cost factor, Johnson shows a practical understanding of how schools must make difficult budget decisions.

Most notably, Johnson supports her argument by pointing to international examples. She notes that countries like Finland and Singapore, which rank among the top in education, use standardized testing far less than American schools do. Instead, they focus on teacher development and student support. These examples show that schools can reach high standards without depending heavily on testing.

In conclusion, Johnson presents the stronger case against standardized testing. Her argument looks beyond theoretical benefits and instead examines how testing affects students, teachers, and schools in practice. By considering economic costs, international examples, and the impact on equity, Johnson shows why schools should move toward better ways of evaluating learning and improving education.

(351 words)

More GED Essay Examples